Bridging the gap between Australia's operational resilience framework and emerging threats to autonomous AI architectures. Operationalizing the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications.
CPS 230 mandates that regulated entities effectively manage operational risks associated with critical service providers. When autonomous AI agents are integrated into core banking chains, their security posture directly dictates the institution's operational resilience.
Tracking agent-to-vendor (LLM) prompts as critical third-party dependencies under CPS 230.
Establishing circuit breakers to prevent agentic "hallucination loops" from disrupting severe payment thresholds.
Translating general AI concerns into hard, undeniable evidence for APRA-regulated institutions.
A zero-trust operational layer that maps OWASP security controls back to CPS 230 governance obligations.
Capture the full request lifecycle to provide reviewable evidence for internal risk and audit committees.
Telemetry GuideGenerate on-demand evidence reports to demonstrate operational resilience during regulatory reviews.
Compliance FAQVisualize how policy enforcement fits into the critical path between AI models and payment rails.
Technical FlowWhile CPS 230 governs operational resilience and critical third-party risk, CPS 234 specifically mandates information security capabilities, information asset classification and APRA incident notification obligations. Together, they form the complete APRA governance picture for AI in banking.
Ensures AI agents don't introduce systemic disruption to critical banking services. Covers third-party dependency management, business continuity and incident response for operational risk.
Banking ControlsRequires APRA entities to maintain information security capabilities proportionate to their risk profile. For AI, this means enforcing access controls, managing data in transit and evidencing security controls for regulatory review.
CPS 234 Alignment